1991 H.S.Sagar drafts a letter to the Council for Mrs Rawlinson to copy stating

she cannot afford to repair the windows to her tenants flat.

 

25/02/92 Insurance claim for loss of Jewelery and cash to the sum of £3.215.00

 

00/00/93 Debt to council for £3.400.00 enforcement order. for works to tenants flat

 

18/11/93 Sagar fraudulently becomes the landlord on paper posing as the owner .. of Mrs Rawlinson's property and applies for rent increase

 

22/04/94 Sagar harassment of tenant by letter, threat of eviction she is aged 80 yrs

22/04/94 Sagar tries to obtain by fraud the Title deeds of Mrs Rawlinson's property for £5.000 . true value £75.000

 

22/06/94 Tenant vacates the flat after 22 years Loss of £68 rent

 

24/06/94 Recovery of debt restarts Council demand £50 a month

 

06/07/94 Sagar become the sole beneficiary and executor of Mrs Rawlingson's

estate

 

26/09/94 Citizens Advice Bureau advised Mrs Rawlinson that bankruptcy was a real possibility , and a danger of loss of home.

 

12/11/94 Council makes offer via Sagar's Solicitor's for Mrs Rawlinson to clear . . debt at £10 a month this was not taken up.

 

10/01/95 Mrs Rawlinson threatened with insolvency

 

20/01/95 Bailiffs calling on Mrs Rawlinson to possess goods

 

14/03/95 Sagar entered onto Land Registry, of Mrs Rawlinson's property his solicitors M. Goowin oversaw the transfer the attesting witness was

named as Sapna Kaushal she actualy a relative of the transferee Mr

H.S.Sagar's she did not sign the document .

 

24/04/95 Mrs Rawlinson appears in the insolvency court without legal

representation ?

 

06/05/95 Letter drafted by Sagar offering to pay £10 a month of the debt and having a charge put on the house after ignoring the offer the

 Council made on the 12/11/94

 

12/05/95 Bailiffs calling on Mrs Rawlinson to possess goods .

 

24/05/95 Council response to letter 06/05/95 agreeing to the charge upon the property. Sagar directs Mrs R by writing in the margin of this letter stating NO to the land charge .of cause he wouldn't want a charge on the propertyhe was now on the land registry, mission accomplished .

This debt charade carried on to at least 1997 debt  was still ongoing in 1997.

 

22/11/99 Mrs Rawlinson's forged signature on a quote from Alpha Piping

Consultants, a fictitious ? company of Sagars using Mrs Rawlinson's

address as company address 32 Hove st Hove. to a Mr M.Francis ,for

pipeline materials to the value of £64.198.97.

 

Sept/2004 My Mother decided to have a new Will prepared she contacted my brother Anthony who suggested that she should see her doctor, this was done .The Will was drafted together with an Enduring power of Attorney document by the solicitors Howell Jones of Leatherhead this Will was to favor Anthony and his wife Linda solely and exclude H.S.Sagar as he was wealthy and didn't need her money.

The solicitor communicated a letter to my Mother 29/08/04 enclosing a

draft of an Enduring Power of Attorney document for her consideration.

One way or another H.S.Sagar the beneficiary of the previous will of

1994 discovered the existence of this new Will preparation and

communicated by letter to the solicitors preparing the will , (failing to

inform them that he was the sole beneficiary of the current will in force)

making accusations of forgery (ether directed at the solicitors or the

new beneficiary)

Tortious interference?

 

THE LETTER

Howell-Jones Partnership,                                                  32 Hove St

52 High Street,                                                                             hove.

Leatherhead.                                                                          E.Sussex

Surrey                                                                                    BN3 2DH

KT2 SAJ

                                                                                         Date: 26.10.04

Attn. Helen Hotten

Dear Miss/Madam

I am writing on behalf of Mrs. Rawlinson ,in reply to your letter of 6/l0/04 to confirm in writing., that the letter you received claiming to be written by her was NOT written by her and it is a serious offense to forge a document of this nature.

Please be informed that she already has a legally prepared will and there is no need for you to prepare any document of any sort.

Yours Faithfully

H S Sagars signature here

 

PP .Mrs M. Rawlinson (Mrs R didn't sign

 

I have communicated by letter to the Solicitor requesting all documentation and correspondence who have declined on the grounds of client confidentiality personally I doubt whether he actually sent this letter to the solicitors He couldn't be that stupid could he ?involving a third party My reason for thinking this is that if the solicitor had received such a letter wouldn't it be the solicitors duty of care to investigate especially since the accusation was false as the letter of instruction in question from my mother to the solicitor was genuine and my brother or sister in law had no hand in it what so ever, I have their utmost assurance on this.

 

2005 Mr Sagar's wife is added onto the land register no monies paid ,so this now gives him a two third stake so obtaining a controlling interest for the Sagars

In 2006 An outside Metal staircase was erected at the cost of £4.600 mother paying the full amount even though the Sagars had a 2/3 interest in the property by way of joint tenants.

2007 Mrs Rawlinson (93) is taken to a solicitor by Sagar to make a new Will favoring the Sagars as sole beneficiaries Sagar made the initial appointment by phone from Manchester on the 22/05/07 , he informed Mr N.Bailey that he was planning a trip to Hove on the 29/05/07 and that Mrs Rawlinson wished to amend her will. explaining why she had made no provisions for her two sons in her 1994 Will and that he would be able to bring her to Bunkers solicitors office ,so she could see someone about it.

At the attendance meeting on the 29/05/07 Mr B. Sagar and Mrs Rawlinson attended at the same time in the same room as Mr Bailey, the Will writer (not a solicitor).

Mr H.S Sagar in the presence of Mrs Rawlinson made a verbal statement to Mr N. Bailey the Will writer .He stated that Mrs Rawlinson had two sons who only recently had been in regular contact with her following many years where they had not been in touch with her at all he said this was one of the reasons why she has left her entire estate to him he goes on to say that Mrs Rawlinson regards him as her adopted son He said that “Mrs Rawlinson now wishes to have a statement prepared for her in which she confirms that she has made no provision for her sons in her Will , and in which she sets out her reasons for this.”

He then leaves the room.

The contents of the memorandum were actually handwritten by the beneficiary ,it is incoherent ,jumbled with alterations deletions and grossly inaccurate,

 

2008 Mr H.S.Sagar instigated the installation of Double Glazing to the property to the value of £4.400 Mrs Rawlinson financed this solely , even though the beneficiaries and joint tenants H.S.Sagar and his wife H.K.Sagar were 2/3 co owners thus taking a pecuniary advantage again plundering the testatrix capital.

In 2007 the neighbor Laura told me that Mother had said to her that Mr Sagar wanted to replace the Double Glazing with new ,but she thought it unnecessary, In 2008 after a very dubious reported break in ,he directed my Mother to make a false claim to the insurance company for a replacement Kitchen window (The original repairers quoted £55 to repair the window but Mr Sagar ignored this and directed my mother by a written note to report to the insurance company that the window was beyond repair and the cost would be £500 which without inspection the insurance paid out I have the original documentary proof of this fact of which I passed on to the insurance company. who in reply stated that they had paid out on the claim on information received which was in Mr Sagar's own hand my mother only signed the letter of claim. So to conclude not only has Mr Sagar committed a fraud by writing this claim he has cohered my mother also but then she was only doing what she was told as always as in the direction to the Insurance assessors,“Tell them it is £ 500.00 to replace and the window is unrepairable” (FI 2) also see ( FI 1) the repairers quote.

 

 

 

My personal view after studying and analyzing all factual documentation .

 

This man Mr H.S. Sagar is a business man he owns at least four properties in Manchester that are let out to students, he supposedly runs an International Company (dormant for 13 years ),he was a University graduate in Office and Sales Management, Mrs Rawlinson was elderly in her 90s of low education. She trusted him explicitly in all her financial matters as he was a businessmen man ,why wouldn't she? HE PUT IT TO HER THAT HE WAS A WEALTHY BUISSNESSMAN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT SHE WAS completely TAKEN IN (the company AMR Pipelines LTD he supposedly ran, is registered at Companies House as a Dormant company and has been from 1995 TO 2008 THAT'S 18 YEARS AS A DORMANT COMPANY ,AN OTHER COMPANY 

ADVANCE VALVES (UK) LTD dorment 14 years 1998

  another company AMR Pipelines Products Co , is not registered, but ships containers from Felixstowe to the Water Authority in the Cayman Island another company Apher Piping Consultants I believe was fictitious but I have a quote for equipment to the value of £64.198.78 with my mother's forged signature upon it (original)dated 22/11/99 she was aged 85

WITH ALL his SUBTERIFUGE over a period of 17 yrs

 she didn't stand a chance she was completely hoodwinked , he kept her in a perpetual state of fear of losing her home,between 1993-1995 The debt was on going for at least six years ,when it could have been rectified by a simple Direct Debit of £10 a month in 1994 ,this man is a professional he cannot claim ignorance .Lets look at it in detail

(1)

How the debt occurred : after Mrs Rawlinson's tenant received an increase in rent demand ,she complained to her solicitors as to the upkeep of their flat ,the council inspected the flat and required the landlord Mrs R to make repairs ,these were ignored .Mr H.S.Sagar who used the name B.Sagar (bosh or bash) drafted a letter in response, for Mrs Rawlinson to copy and send as a reply to the demand ,stating that she could not afford to repair the window pains and that the tenant made herself unavailable when workmen required access .Letters went back and forth ( all drafted by Sagar) with excuses until the Council made an order for repairs to be carried out this was duly done by council contract in 1991 their bill amounted to £3.400.

(2)

On the19/08/91 Mr H.S.Sagar wrote an unusual letter to the Rent Registry stating that he was planning to purchase Mrs Rawlinsons property ,32 Hove St, that he had already viewed the property, he understood that the rent for the ground floor flat was shortly to be reviewed ,if he did purchase the property he would keep Mrs Rawlinson on as his Caretaker. This is the start of a premeditated fraud as we shall see.

(3)

His next correspondence to the Rent Registry 27 months later dated the 09/11/93 in the form of a letter inquiring about the rent increase application, and asking to increase the rent to £80 per week and that the rent is still payable to Mrs Rawlinson, who will continue to reside in the upper flat as theCaretaker, he used his Manchester address for return correspondence using the name “ Bash Sagar” but signed his own signature H.S.Sagar.

(4)

It was assumed by the rent register that Mr Bash Sagar was the landlord and owner of 32 Hove St Hove, they send him the RR1 Form to his Manchester address.

He completes this rent increase form,RR1 officially stating that he Mr Bash Sagar is the Landlord /owner and is seeking a rent increase of £80 per week for the ground floor flat in 32 Hove St .He duly signs this official document not as the Landlords agent but as the Landlord but states that he is Mr Bash Sagar were his real name is Mr Harbilas Singh Sagar, there are several pieces of correspondence arranging inspections of premises and such ,sent to his Manchester address, to a Mr Bash Sagar

A fair rent is decided upon being £68 per week .his response is high handed, irrational and extremely insulting to the officials considering he is perpetrating a fraud against Mrs Rawlinson and will progress to further frauds is rather stupid but then he is rather arrogant or maybe has some mental illness he has convinced himself that he actually owns the property?

This is the actual wording of his reply to the Rent Registry

 

I am in receipt of your rent registration notification of 7.2.94.

I feel that the amount you have registered is an insult and is totally unrealistic. About double of what you have set is the current market rent that can easily be obtained.

I appreciate that the tenant has been resident there for some years and some concession in rent is applicable but what you have decided is pathetic.

The rent I have asked for is extremely reasonable.

You are suppose to set a “FAIR” rent but this appears to be fair only on the tenant and thecouncil who I presume is in effect paying the rent as a benefit and this I advocate is your Main consideration.

Unless you are prepared to consider a realistic rent figure, you leave me no choice but to seek a termination of the tenant’s occupancy.There is no writtenagreement between the tenant, myself or any previous owners.

I am also objecting to the date from which the increased rent should become effective. I made an application on 22.11.93 which was several months later than it could have been made and should be effective within a short time;it is not my problem,with respect,if you are unable to act, more quickly due to pressure of work.

 

I look forward to your further news.

 

Yours faithfully

 

B. Sagar

 

(5) In the mean time Sagar is drafting all letters for Mrs Rawlinson to a Mr Batten of the Council Legal Dept, concerning the none payment of the debt of £3.400 , the Council get fed up with the schilling stalling (Sagars work) and decide to make an order for the tenant to pay her rent direct to the Council ,after some delays the order is served upon the tenant who begins to pay her rent direct to the Council by order. On the 15/04/94 Sagar writes a letter as a friend of Mrs Rawlinson (not on this occasion stating himself as being the landlord ) to Mr Tim Sainsbury the MP of Hove complaining that the Council had ordered the tenant to pay her rent direct to the Council and who are bulldozing her and behaving like a middle eastern dictatorship where in fact it was his willful contrivance and the abusing of an elderly widows trust and susceptibility ,as a pawn for his own fraudulent purposes ( the problem would have been resolved in normal circumstances by a Direct Debit)

 

No way would a son ( as he professes he was) allow his Mother to get into this predicament !! of worry and distress at the possibility of losing her home

 

22/04/94 Mr Sagar writes a harassment letter to the 80 yrs tenant :

 

Dear Mrs. Shillaker,

I understand that you have stopped paying the rent for your flat to Mrs.Rawlinson who collects on my behalf.

This is clearly not acceptable arid means that you are no longer entitled to stay in the flat. A tenant would normally be made to vacate the flat immediately but I am placing you on 30 days notice to do so.

After this period,I shall take whatever steps are necessary to gain vacant possession unless the rent payment is resumed and brought up to date.

B . Sagar

HE WAS NOT THE LANDLORD OR OWNER, MRS RAWLINSON WAS THE SOLE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY

 

As one can see in the letter 5/04/94 (Doc 11) to the M.P. T.Sainsbury Sagar explains that the rent is being paid direct to the Council by order. So in the the above letter 22/04/94 to the elderly widow tenant threatening her with eviction if rent not paid to his Caretaker Mrs Rawlinson he was masquerading as the landlord and acting as a Rakmanite not only was he being dishonest he was also acting criminally by attempting to defraud the Council of the monies due to them, so in this letter alone he has committed three crimes (elder abuse, harassment of a tenant, attempted fraud , if not in actual Law at the least it shows his unscrupulousself interest he didn't care who he hurt threatening elderly women) that's something else but he had to get rid of the tenent befor he could move on his aim was the ownership of the property

(6)

Mr Sagar writes a letter on the same date as the above 22/04/94 as though written by Mrs Rawlinson to be posted to himself addressed to his solicitors in which he fraudulently tries to obtain the Title Deeds of Mrs Rawlinson's property :

 

 

 

 

THE LETTER

                                                                                              32 Hove st ;

M.Goodwin & Co;                                                                              Hove.

416₁Wilmslow Rd.;                                                                          Sussex.

Withington,

Manchester .1420 9BW                                                            Date 22/4/94

 

Dear Mr . Goodwin,

RE: 32 Hove St; Hove

 

Here are the title deeds to the above property. I understand that you’ve indicated that there may be a conflict of interests but in the circumstances,I do not agree because of my relationship with Mr.Sagar.

I can not afford to pay for the servicesof an independent legal adviser and. confirm that I wish you to act on my behalf in connection with the transfer to Mr.Sagar for an agreed nominal price of £5.000.00.

 

Mr.Sagar will be responsible for your legal costs.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Mrs. Mabel Rawlinson

 

ENC. Title Deeds

 

This letter was never sent, at least Mrs Rawlinson had sense to see through this obvious trick I have the original copy with handwritten proof of Sagars connection.

 

On the 24/06/94 the tenant quits the flat after 22 yrs occupancy and of cause along goes with her the £68 per wk rent .The Council now demand £50 per month to pay off the debt, it seems that Mrs Rawlinson was unaware of the financial implications, as on or about 03/07/94 she is taken to Manchester to Mr Sagars solicitors Mark Goodwin to make a Will to favor Sagar as sole beneficiary to her estate diverting from a earlier Will four years previously that favored her own family namely the two sons and her two grand children. This new Will was a rushed single page and appeared home made with two quirks in it that shows that Sagar possibly had a hand in the drafting , it is witnessed by his own solicitors Mark Goodwin

Sagar continues to draft all correspondence concerning the debt to the council he involves his solicitors in her case 05/05/94 the Hove council legal dept start to communicate with Sagars solicitors Mark Goodwin. In a fax from these solicitors to the Council Legal dept dated 28/09/94 they refer to a communication some time ago with the Council concerning Mrs Rawlinson and her debt ,there is documentary evidence that they were acting or involved with Mrs Rawlinson financial problems at the time of the 1994 Will drafting. And there is strong documentary evidence that H.S.Sagar had a hand in the actual Will drafting as there is a fault but the connection to Sagar is circumstantial but very strong!

So if the beneficiaries own solicitor drafted the Will with the assistance of the beneficiary and were acting for the testatrix in an other matter at the same time surly this is an undue influence, who independently advised the testatrix ? why didn't she use her previous solicitor's based in Hove? instead of traveling 250 miles to Manchester to Sagar's solicitors?

14/03/95

Mr Sagar is entered onto the land registry using again his own solicitors Mark Goodwin this document is not on the face of it an official land registry document it is typed out ,it was prepared at an earlier date ? Sagar's sister was named as the attesting witness but it was not signed by her, just her name and address handwritten .but no signature to attest to the transfer surely they must sign as witness to show physical evidence that she was present ? If not the transfer is void .Was Mrs Rawlinson independently advised ? By whom ? How could she be the solicitors were the transferees it was a fraud

24/04/95

Mrs Rawlinson was due to appear before the insolvency court for debt. I believe that she was coerced into believing that if H.S.Sagar was entered onto the land registry that the property would be protected , considering all the threats and warnings of her immanent possible bankruptcy and loss of home (Mr Batten of the Council legal dept, and the Citizen Advise Bureau.

H.S.Sagar and Sagar's solicitor's Mark Goodwin,) had full knowledge of this as Mr Batten of the Hove Council legal dept had communicated this fact to them on the 10/11/94, No one it appears, gave her advise to take up the offer that the Council Legal Dept presented to( £10 per mth to clear the debt) Sagars Solicitors and Sagar himself prior to her appearance before the insolvency court it would have been known by these professionals, that the land transfer option was an absolute no no ,as the insolvency Court has three years from the transfer of property to insolvency to snatch back what ever property had been transferred ,so solicitors were aware that the house was not protected by law , (the solicitors Mark Goodwin specialize in conveyancing and property management )it is obvious that she never received professional advice in this matter ,the only gain was Sagars half ownership of Mrs Rawlinsons property valued at the time £75.000 This was an uneducated confused woman in her 80s with the threat and fear of home loss and her future security hanging in the balance ,in the hands of Sagar who she completely trusted but in fact being wrongly advised by two Professionals ,one who continually professed that he was like a son to her but his sole motivation was to gain control of her property as previous actions and documentary evidence proves. Mr Sagar had no excuse as he is a Professional,  Director of his international import and export company AMR Pipeline Products Co Shipping containers from Felixstow to Miami another company AMR PIPELINES LIMITED is registered but has been Dormant for 16 YEARS  He is the owner of at least 5 properties in the Manchester area, most let out to the student community.

22/11/99 A four page estimate from ALPHA PIPING CONSULTANTS to a Mr M.Francis for Piping equipment to the value of £64.198.97 using Mrs Rawlinson address ,32 Hove St as the contact address and telephone number , Mrs Rawlinson's forged signature is upon it, Mrs Rawlinson was aged 85 at that time .I have the original document. Perhaps this has no relevance in the present matter but it is all part does make one wonder what was going on

its obvious that  he's just another THIRD WORLD CAPITALISTIC PIG the type of VERMIN THAT SITS ATOP OF MOUNTAINS OF GRAIN MAKING CAPITAL IN THE COMMODITIES MARKET WHILE  WOMEN AND CHILDREN STARVE